The Mobile Architecture of Yona Friedman: Innovative and Transformative

During the 50’s a new architectural concept was developed by Yona Friedman in collaboration with the group GEAM “Groupe d’étude d’architecture mobile”. In 1958 the Hungarian-Israeli architect published a manifesto called Architecture Mobile that fostered a new type of free citizen able to conquer the space through huge ‘superstructures’ over the existing cities. Friedman envisioned that the increase of leisure time would profoundly change society, therefore cities should adapt to the new era.

The idea of the Ville Spatiale was to assure for its inhabitant the freedom to shape both their individual habitat and the city layout, freely after their preferences.

The second element of that idea was the Architecture mobile, the possibility to periodically remodel the individual habitat and urban layout, without imposing demolition.¹

This spatial approach wanted to promote the growth of cities without exhausting the use of land, for this, a spatial structure in terms of Yona Friedman could superpose the pre-existing to achieve denser cities in which the citizen would have the freedom to expand it’s own home. The architect wanted to illustrate experts and non-specialists about architecture and urbanism so they could achieve an individual freedom.

Critical for the Ville Spatial is what I call ‘spatial infrastructure’: a multi-storey space-frame-grid, which is supported by widely-spaced piles. […]

This infrastructure forms the fixed element of the city. The mobile element consists of walls, base-surfaces and dividing walls which make the individual division of the space possible; it could be called the ‘filling’ for the infrastructure.

All elements which come into direct contact with the users (i.e. those they see, touch etc.) are mobile, in contrast to the infrastructure, which is used collectively and remains fixed.²

The citation accurately relates Yona Friedman’s intentions. Half a century later, we can compare the theory with some built examples, observing different levels of success. Duplicating the “ground floor” and having an unlimited built area seems not to always be the solution to urban issues.

1. Friedman, Yona, Kenneth Frampton, and María I. Rodríguez. Arquitectura Con La Gente, Por La Gente, Para La Gente =: Architecture with the People, by the People, for the People. León: MUSAC, 2011.

2. Yona Friedman, Architecture Mobile, 1960, quoted in Ruth Eaton, Ideal Cities: Utopianism and the (Un)built Environment, London 2002.