China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CP IB U
China’s Bird’s Nest | © Iwan Baan

The National Stadium, famously known as the “Bird’s Nest,” is one of the most iconic architectural works of the 21st century. Designed by Swiss architects Herzog & de Meuron, it served as the centerpiece for the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Situated in the heart of the Olympic complex, the stadium was conceived not only as a sports venue but as a lasting contribution to Beijing’s urban fabric. Its design, emerging from an international competition held between 2002 and 2003, transformed an Olympic structure into a new kind of public space that remains functional and culturally significant to this day.

Bird’s Nest National Stadium Technical Information

Structure = Façade = Roof = Space

– Herzog & de Meuron Architects

Bird’s Nest National Stadium Photographs
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CP IB H
© Iwan Baan
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CP IB
© Iwan Baan
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CP IB
© Iwan Baan
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CP IB H
© Iwan Baan
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CO
© Iwan Baan
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron EV MES K
© Mehrdad Safra
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CO
© Iwan Baan
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CP IB H
© Iwan Baan
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CP DM H
© Duccio Malagamba
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CO IB H
© Iwan Baan
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron CO IB H
© Iwan Baan

 Architectural Form and Structure: A Nest of Interwoven Elements

The project’s early success was evident even before the stadium was built, as the Chinese public embraced its unique design, nicknaming it the “Bird’s Nest.” This nickname speaks to the essence of the design—an interwoven steel structure resembling the organic shape of a nest. The architects’ vision was not limited to creating a venue for a single event but to designing a site that could evolve into a vibrant public space, fostering social interactions long after the Games ended.

From a distance, the National Stadium presents itself as a monolithic structure, a large collective form that echoes the undulating curves of its terrain. Its rounded silhouette, defined by the crisscrossing steel supports, is both striking and orderly from afar. Yet, as one approaches, the clarity of this form dissolves into a complex grid of beams, columns, and supports. The closer one gets, the more the stadium reveals its intricacies, with the seemingly chaotic steel structure creating a dynamic visual experience.

This play between order and chaos is central to the stadium’s architectural narrative. Herzog & de Meuron intentionally designed the structure to evoke a sense of natural complexity, akin to walking through a forest of branches. The stadium’s latticework blurs the boundaries between façade, structure, and space. What might initially appear to be a simple exterior shell is, in reality, a multifaceted network of public spaces, circulation paths, and vertical elements, each contributing to the building’s urban and social role.

The transitional space between the stadium’s interior and exterior is particularly noteworthy. This zone, where paths intersect, and public amenities are located, is not just an architectural boundary—it’s a space designed for people to gather, socialize, and experience the building as more than a sports arena. It functions as an autonomous urban site, an open invitation for public life to thrive in Beijing, a city with a deep-rooted tradition of communal outdoor activities.

Sustainable and Structural Innovation: Beyond Façade and Function

Herzog & de Meuron’s approach to the design of the Bird’s Nest was both radical and innovative. The architects adopted a design philosophy in which the structure itself became the façade, and the roof, structure, and space were seamlessly integrated. In this case, the building’s form is derived entirely from its structural elements, and no traditional façade is needed. The entire stadium is a study of how architecture can blur the lines between ornamentation and function, producing a building that is at once an aesthetic statement and a feat of engineering.

One of the most innovative aspects of the stadium is its use of a translucent membrane to fill the spaces between the steel framework. This membrane is reminiscent of birds using soft materials to fill the gaps in their nests. This analogy extends beyond aesthetics; the membrane allows natural light to penetrate the building while providing protection from the elements, all without the need for solid walls. Additionally, the stadium’s open structure promotes natural ventilation, reducing the need for mechanical cooling systems. This sustainable approach is a key element of the stadium’s design, ensuring that it remains environmentally responsible while maintaining its iconic appearance.

The lack of a solid façade is not just an aesthetic choice but a deliberate move toward sustainability and functionality. By eliminating enclosed walls, the architects created a breathable building that allows air to flow freely, enhancing the experience for spectators and reducing the building’s environmental footprint. This natural ventilation system is one of the defining features of the stadium’s sustainable design, reinforcing Herzog & de Meuron’s commitment to environmentally conscious architecture.

The Bowl: A Vessel for Collective Experience

The stadium’s interior is dominated by a massive bowl-like structure designed to focus attention on the events unfolding on the field. The continuous, evenly constructed seating bowl ensures that spectators remain engaged and connected to the action. The architects minimized structural interruptions to create a smooth, uninterrupted seating flow, allowing the human crowd to become an integral part of the architecture.

This bowl enhances the spectators’ experience and plays a vital role in creating a sense of unity and collective excitement. The architecture becomes secondary to the crowd’s energy, with the design emphasizing the communal nature of the events hosted within. In this sense, the human presence within the stadium completes the architectural narrative—the architecture frames and enhances the collective experience of spectators, athletes, and performers alike.

Acoustically, the stadium was designed to amplify the crowd’s energy, with a concealed ceiling structure that directs sound towards the field. This design choice not only enhances the atmosphere within the stadium but also helps create a focused, intense environment for the athletes. Though monumental in scale, the architecture remains fundamentally human in its approach, reinforcing the connection between the space, its users, and the events taking place.

Bird’s Nest National Stadium Plans

China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron DR GROUND FLOOR
Floor Plan | © Herzog & de Meuron
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron DR TH FLOOR
Floor Plan | © Herzog & de Meuron
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron DR ST FLOOR
Floor Plan | © Herzog & de Meuron
China Iconic Bird Nest The National Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron DR SECTION S
Section | © Herzog & de Meuron

Bird’s Nest National Stadium Image Gallery

About Herzog & de Meuron

Herzog & de Meuron is a Swiss architecture firm founded in 1978 by Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron. Known for their innovative approach to materials and structure, they have designed many iconic projects, including the Tate Modern in London, the Beijing National Stadium (Bird’s Nest), and the Elbphilharmonie in Hamburg. Their work often blends art and architecture, characterized by a deep exploration of context and form. Herzog & de Meuron have received numerous awards, including the Pritzker Architecture Prize in 2001, solidifying their place among the world’s leading architectural practices.

Notes & Additional Credits
  1. Partners: Jacques Herzog, Pierre de Meuron, Harry Gugger, Stefan Marbach
  2. Project Team: Linxi Dong (Project Architect, Associate), Mia Hägg (Project Architect, Associate), Tobias Winkelmann (Project Architect, Associate), Jean Paul Jaccaud (Project Architect), Thomas Polster (Project Architect), Peter Karl Becher, Béla Berec, Alexander Berger, Felix Beyreuther, António Branco, Marcos Carreño, Xudong Chen, Simon Chessex, Massimo Corradi, Gustavo Espinoza, Hans Focketyn, Andreas Fries, Yichun He, Volker Helm, Patric Heuberger, Yong Huang, Kasia Jackowska, Uta Kamps, Hiroshi Kikuchi, Martin Krapp, Hemans Lai, Emily Liang, Kenan Liu, Donald Mak, Carolina Mojto, Christopher Nicholas Pannett, Daniel Pokora, Roland Rossmaier, Luciano Rotoli, Christoph Röttinger, Mehrdad Safa, Philipp Schaerer, Roman Sokalski, Heeri Song, Antje Voigt, Christof Weber, Pim van Wijlick, Claudia Winkelmann, Thomasine Wolfensberger, Camillo Zanardini, Xiaolei Zhang
  3. In Collaboration With: Chinese Artist and Curator, Artistic Advisor: Ai Weiwei, Beijing, China
  4. Client: National Stadium Co. Ltd, Beijing, China
  5. Planning: General Planning (Competition): Design Consortium: Herzog & de Meuron, Basel, Switzerland, Arup, London, UK, China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China; General Planning: Design Consortium: Herzog & de Meuron, Basel, Switzerland, Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China, China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China; Architect Planning: Herzog & de Meuron, Basel, Switzerland; Architect Construction: China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China
  6. Electrical Engineering: China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China, Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China;
  7. HVAC Engineering: China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China, Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China;
  8. Plumbing Engineering: China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China, Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China;
  9. Mechanical Engineering: China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China, Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China;
  10. Structural Engineering: China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China, Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
  11. Landscape Design: Herzog & de Meuron, Basel, Switzerland, China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China
  12. Sports Consultant (Competition): Arup Sport, London, UK;
  13. Acoustic Consulting: China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China, Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China;
  14. Building Physics Consulting: China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China, Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China;
  15. 3D Visualization: Artefactory, Paris, France (3D-modeling and computer renderings);
  16. Fire Protection Consulting: Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China, China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China;
  17. Lighting Consulting: Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China, China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China;
  18. Civil Engineering: China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China;
  19. Traffic Consulting: China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing, China;
  20. Cladding Design Consulting: R & R Fuchs, Munich, Germany;
  21. Geology Consulting: Beijing Survey Design and Research Institute, Beijing, China;
  22. Signage Consulting: New Identity Ltd., Basel, Switzerland;
  23. Supervisions: CIECC Engineering & Construction Project Management Corp, Beijing, China
  24. Site Area: 2,183,995 sqft, 202,900 sqm
  25. Number of Levels: 8