Aerial Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery | © Iwan Baan

Designed by Le Corbusier in the mid-20th century, the Chapel of Notre-Dame du Haut in Ronchamp remains a seminal work of religious architecture, drawing visitors for its sculptural form and the spiritual resonance it evokes. Adding a monastery for the Poor Clare nuns and associated visitor facilities introduces a new architectural layer that reinterprets the site with sensitivity and restraint. This intervention is not a gesture of dominance but a deference: an architecture that seeks silence, blending into the topography while fostering reflection and retreat.

Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery Technical Information

A place of silence, prayer, peace and joy, where everything contributes to spiritual contemplation.

– RPBW Architects

Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery Photographs

Aerial Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Aerial View | © Iwan Baan
Forest Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Forest | © RPBW – Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects
Night Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Forest | © Coussirat, Quention
Space Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Interior | © Vitra AG
Interior Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Interior | © Vitra AG

Reinterpreting the Sacred Site: Design Intent and Programmatic Approach

The new project’s primary ambition is to re-establish Bourlemont Hill’s contemplative character. While the chapel remains the spiritual nucleus, introducing a monastic program with the presence of the Poor Clares deepens the site’s religious significance. The architectural approach acknowledges Le Corbusier’s masterpiece without emulating its form or rhetoric. Instead, it introduces three discrete yet interconnected elements: the gatehouse, the monastery, and the reconfigured landscape.

The spatial arrangement respects the gradient of public to private experiences. The gatehouse marks the hill entrance and mediates the arrival of pilgrims and tourists. The monastery, further integrated into the slope, houses the sisters’ contemplative life. Meanwhile, the oratory offers a parallel space for prayer, independent of but in dialogue with the chapel. This layered programming forms a nuanced spiritual ecosystem in which architecture supports a rhythm of silence, community, and reflection.

Spatial Experience and the Architecture of Contemplation

The gatehouse, replacing the previous visitors’ center, functions as a spatial threshold. It is a hybrid space; part institutional, part interpretative. A large glazed facade dissolves the boundary between the interior and the surrounding forested slope, orienting visitors toward the chapel and the landscape. The program includes a ticket office, archive facilities, a small shop, and a bioclimatic garden. These uses are modest, but their arrangement suggests a choreography of transition from the secular to the sacred.

Further up the hill, the monastery complex emerges with subtlety. The nuns’ living quarters are conceived as small concrete cells, each measuring 2.7 x 2.7 meters, nestled into the slope in clusters. Their austere dimensions speak of a life of spiritual rigor, yet each cell includes a winter garden—an enclosed, introspective space oriented toward the landscape. These gardens function as both a visual buffer and a meditative frame, enhancing the interior spatiality without compromising the ethos of seclusion.

The communal elements of the monastery, including the refectory, workshops, and oratory, are organized to facilitate daily rituals and collective practices. The oratory, in particular, acts as a counterpoint to the chapel. It is embedded into the hill and separated from Le Corbusier’s structure, yet it shares the same spiritual gravity. Unlike the iconic chapel, which declares itself from afar, the oratory invites intimacy and quiet communion.

Material Strategy and the Aesthetic of Modesty

Materially, the new architecture speaks in hushed tones. Concrete is the dominant element, chosen not for monumentality but for its capacity to age, to absorb light, and to carry the weight of silence. The decision to work with concrete, zinc, and wood reflects a deliberate commitment to an ascetic palette, echoing the monastic life of the Poor Clares.

The architectural expression avoids mimicry. There is no attempt to replicate Le Corbusier’s sculptural exuberance. Instead, the new buildings embed themselves into the earth, carving space rather than asserting volume. This strategy enhances the visual and spatial hierarchy of the site: the chapel remains the focal point, while the new elements recede, acting as topographical complements rather than architectural statements.

Using zinc for roofing and wooden details for interiors and garden elements introduces warmth and tactility without distracting from the monastic rigor. The minimal aesthetic is not a stylistic preference but a conceptual necessity, reinforcing the values of humility and reflection central to the project.

Landscape as Spiritual Medium and Environmental Agent

Bourlemont Hill is not a backdrop but a central protagonist in the architectural narrative. The site’s natural contours inform every decision, from circulation to siting. Rather than clearing vegetation to assert visibility, the architects preserve existing trees and reforest the slopes where appropriate. The result is an immersive natural environment that encourages slowness and perceptual engagement.

Orientation plays a critical role in the experiential quality of the spaces. The individual cells of the nuns face west, opening toward the valley, offering both visual release and a symbolic gesture of openness. The monastery’s embeddedness in the terrain fosters a microclimate of thermal stability while reducing visual impact—a pragmatic and philosophical alignment with sustainability and discretion.

Environmental performance is addressed not through technological exhibitionism, but through passive strategies and careful planning. The bioclimatic garden within the gatehouse, the concrete’s thermal mass, and the dwellings’ compactness all contribute to energy efficiency without compromising spatial quality.

Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery Plans

Site Plan Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Site Plan | © RPBW – Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects
Sketch Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Sketch | © RPBW – Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects
Section Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Section | © RPBW – Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects
Plan Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Floor Plan | © RPBW – Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects
Section Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Section | © RPBW – Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects
Plan Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Floor Plan | © RPBW – Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects
Section Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery by Renzo Piano Building Workshop
Monastery Room Section | © RPBW – Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects

Ronchamp Gatehouse and Monastery Image Gallery

About Renzo Piano Building Workshop

Renzo Piano Building Workshop (RPBW) is an internationally acclaimed architectural practice founded by Renzo Piano in 1981. With offices in Genoa, Paris, and New York, the firm is known for its refined and context-sensitive approach, blending innovation with craftsmanship. RPBW’s work spans cultural, institutional, and civic projects, consistently emphasizing light, materiality, and a deep respect for site. Notable projects include the Centre Pompidou in Paris, The Shard in London, and the Jean-Marie Tjibaou Cultural Center in New Caledonia.

Credits and Additional Notes
  1. Landscape Architects: Atelier Corajoud

  2. Design Team: P. Vincent (partner in charge), F. Bolle with N. Boutet, C. Eliard, C. Klipfel, L. Lemoine, N. Meyer, J. Moolhuijzen (partner), M. Prini, D. Rat, M. Rossato Piano, V. Serafini, A. Olivier, M. Milanese, L. Leroy; O. Aubert, C. Colson, Y. Kyrkos (models)

  3. Consultants: SLETEC (structure, MEP, cost control); M. Harlé (graphics and signage); C. Guinaudeau (planting); Nunc / L. Piccon (project coordination); P. Gillmann (construction management)

  4. Monastery Area: 1,700 m²

  5. Gatehouse Area: 450 m²

  6. Total Roofed Area: 1,386 m² (Convent: 263 m²; Poor Clares’ Living Area: 296 m²; Workshops: 120 m²; Oratory: 260 m²; Guest Quarters: 443 m²)

  7. Budget: €9,000,000 (including landscaping and site rehabilitation)